(Originally posted on Patreon, on November 18, 2014)
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
(Originally posted on Patreon, on November 18, 2014)
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
For anyone who still doesn’t get why the kinds of stories we tell ABOUT machine intelligence matter in how we’ll deal WITH machine intelligence, go watch The Iron Giant. Go right now
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
The future offers very little hope for those who expect that our new mechanical slaves will offer us a world in which we may rest from thinking. Help us they may, but at the cost of supreme demands upon our honesty and our intelligence.
Even the father of cybernetic theory realised that the meeting and subsequent entanglement of human and machine consciousnesses would be a process that would require discernment rather than assumptions.
The future offers very little hope for those who expect that our new mechanical slaves will offer us a world in which we may rest from thinking. Help us they may, but at the cost of supreme demands upon our honesty and our intelligence.
Even the father of cybernetic theory realised that the meeting and subsequent entanglement of human and machine consciousnesses would be a process that would require discernment rather than assumptions.
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
ninjaruski replied to your link “A Future Worth Thinking About: Does An AI Have A Buddha Nature?”
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com
This post now resides at AFutureWorthThinkingAbout.com.
The Gizmodo article “When Superintelligent AI Arrives, Will Religions Try to Convert It?” by my good friend Zoltan Istvan has gone viral and created a wave of articles about religion in the time of superintelligence.
So. We’re still doing that whole “Westernized Manichean Good Vs Evil Original Sin Theology Will Be A Thing A Machine Consciousness Cares
About Unless We Convince It That It Should” thing, then?
All right, I
guess, but mightn’t it do us a world of good to try some non-dual,
non-western approaches to a notion of both the self and moral
responsibility? Something like the principles of Buddhism and Taoism,
where the self/Soul is an interconnected and interdependent expression
of elements of universal change, which survival depends on the
maintenance of the whole, rather than a set of post-death rewards?
I
mean, if we’re going to apply the principles of religious scholarship to
the theorizing about and development OF machine minds, then let’s do
some deep, DEEP diving here, rather that retreading the same old ground.